My new Weather config works perfect with the NGX

[bradrcfii 3]

Thanks Paul. That makes sense. The original post says to check that box. Still a little confused.

[Paul Deemer 13]

Thanks Paul. That makes sense. The original post says to check that box. Still a little confused.

So was I but Jim from HiFi told me it doesn't need checked and I can't go back and make any changes to the original post.

[bradrcfii 3]

Oh great. Thanks,

[JSkorna 137]

Hi, You don't have that box checked.

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

So with this config we get even less turbulence than with config for MD11? Am I right?

[Paul Deemer 13]

I am using the current and same config with all my PMDG planes. 737-NGX, MD-11X, 747-400X

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

Ok, but that was not my question. For example, until now, I used those settings for MD11, 747, J41: FSXTurbulenceScale=1.000000 FSUIPCTurbulenceRate=1.0,5.0TurbulenceDivisor=20,20,40,40 without S-turns! Your settings divide those settings in half. My question was, do we get half less turbulence with your settings?

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

I'm just trying to understand this...

[Jetman67 517]

i am also keen to understand why FSX winds aloft is checked if ASE performs this function

[ZKOKQ 986]

Un tick it Wayne, only needed using FSX weather

[Jetman67 517]

thanks

[Paul Deemer 13]

without S-turns! Your settings divide those settings in half. My question was, do we get half less turbulence with your settings?

That is a good question for Jim Skorna at Hi-Fi. I am not sure to what actual degree it affects the turbulence. In any case those are not my settings, they are the recommended settings in the ASE documenation. Most people that have tried the settings have been happy with them. The only people that don't like the settings are the ones that wanna get bounced and smacked around in the cockpit everytime they run into a thunderstorm. The basic fact is that FSX turbulence is totally unrealistic anyway so there is really no point in worrying about it. Having your plane bouncing around and the wings ready to snap off like in FS9 is totally unrealistic and some people just got used to that thinking that is normal behavior in the real world and it is not. Only in the most extreme situations would it happen to that degree, and if it did the wings would probably snap off. Maybe in X-plane 10 or Microsoft Flight they will be able to model turbulence that is more realistic.

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

Thanks!Of course, if anybody knows the answer.. I'd like to hear it!

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

Hm, nobody?

[Dougal 165]

Eeeeeek! My head hurts! Mega confused now. There are so many small changes now. Paul, would you consider reposting to 'sumerise' everything into a single post?