Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
19AB67

Loss of GEN BUS 2: QRH: Land at nearest suitable airport

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, 

 

I am just cruising back as KLM686 MMMX-EHAM over the Golf and get GEN BUS 2 FAULT. 

As a consequence I get the message 'AUX PITOT HEAT INOPERATIVE'. 

 

That's not nice (see the Birgen Air disaster BHY301), but the pilot and co-pilot pitots are ok and should bring us savely over the Atlantic. 

 

Additionally I check the QRH and find to my astonishment on page AP.30.13 that (after a one-time trial to reset the generator)...

- Continue with affectec circuits inoperative

- Land at the nearest suitable airport

- Review applicable consequences

 

Well, the only announced consequence is the inoperative AUX pitot. 

 

Is the loss of GEN BUS 2 yet a reason to divert? 

This seems rather careful. I agree that a second loss in pitot would be reason enough due to unreliable speed indications. 

 

What do the real jockeys do in this situation? 

 

Thanx in advance.


Andreas Berg
pmdg_j41_banner.jpgpmdg_trijet.jpg

PMDG 737NGX -- PMDG J41 -- PMDG 77L/77F/77W -- PMDG B744 -- i7 8700K PC1151 12MB 3.7GHz -- Corsair Cooling H100X -- DDR4 16GB TridentZ -- MSI Z370 Tomahawk -- MSI RTX2080 DUKE 8G OC -- SSD 500GB M.2 -- Thermaltake 550W --
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

 

What do the real jockeys do in this situation?

 

Divert.

 

 

Well, the only announced consequence is the inoperative AUX pitot. 

 

Is the loss of GEN BUS 2 yet a reason to divert? 

This seems rather careful. I agree that a second loss in pitot would be reason enough due to unreliable speed indications.

 

Beeing carefull is important. Many people died because pilots wheren't carefull enough.

 

Always think: Better be on the ground and whish to be in the air than being in the air and wish to be on the ground.

 

BTW: You also loose the battery charger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Point taken. 

A boxed Level 2 Alert should give me the indication that the issue is urgent... 


Andreas Berg
pmdg_j41_banner.jpgpmdg_trijet.jpg

PMDG 737NGX -- PMDG J41 -- PMDG 77L/77F/77W -- PMDG B744 -- i7 8700K PC1151 12MB 3.7GHz -- Corsair Cooling H100X -- DDR4 16GB TridentZ -- MSI Z370 Tomahawk -- MSI RTX2080 DUKE 8G OC -- SSD 500GB M.2 -- Thermaltake 550W --
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A boxed Level 2 Alert should give me the indication that the issue is urgent...

 

A red boxed level 3 alert is urgent. As in land as soon as possible.

 

An amber boxed level 2 alert requires pilot action but is not exactly a reason to divert unless the QRH recommends it.

 

 

Is the loss of GEN BUS 2 yet a reason to divert?

 

If you continue to read the checklist, it states "land at the nearest suitable airport". I think that would be a reason to divert.


Kenny Lee
"Keep climbing"
pmdg_trijet.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I might get speared for saying this, but you can, in fact, be too careful:

Being too careful would mean you never departed in the first place, because removing yourself from terra firma means you're placing yourself at increased risk of harm.  Why risk it, right?

 

While the loss of a GEN BUS has taken you from three to two now, and you've lost your aux pitot, I wouldn't see it as a reason for any crazy diverts.  I see no reason to turn around, and no reason to try and stuff the plane into Greenland or Iceland.  If you're already over the Atlantic, press on to the destination.

 

I'm all for safety, but notional safety is bothersome.


Kyle Rodgers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kyle, 

 

But would Shannon then your choice for the divert? Or do we go on one hour more to EHAM, the home base? 


Andreas Berg
pmdg_j41_banner.jpgpmdg_trijet.jpg

PMDG 737NGX -- PMDG J41 -- PMDG 77L/77F/77W -- PMDG B744 -- i7 8700K PC1151 12MB 3.7GHz -- Corsair Cooling H100X -- DDR4 16GB TridentZ -- MSI Z370 Tomahawk -- MSI RTX2080 DUKE 8G OC -- SSD 500GB M.2 -- Thermaltake 550W --
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But would Shannon then your choice for the divert? Or do we go on one hour more to EHAM, the home base?

 

Personally, I'd push on.

 

Here are my factors:

-GEN BUS Failed - I still have two more, plus a RAT.  I'm now a 767/777/787/330.

-Likelihood the aux pitot heat is going to cause an issue, particularly at cruise - not likely.  Plus, it's aux, not primary.  Care must be taken in avoiding situations that could cause further issues, as a primary failure means any form of icing could be potentially disastrous.

-Maintenance base is AMS - why divert and inconvenience the passengers when it's not an emergency?  I'm sure another field could service the unit, but the cost will likely be a lot higher than if performed by company maintenance.  That's also not including the cost of the delay to the passengers, the aircraft re-positioning later, the landing/servicing fee (among several other fees), and the crew schedule now being thrown off.

 

Sure, your margin of safety just took a hit, but you're still reasonably safe.  Weather is the same way, yet we still fly in it all the time.  Clear weather with no wind or turbulence is ideal, but if weather is out there, we don't immediately start cancelling/diverting flights just because our margin of safety has been reduced.

 

johnnyd2723-albums-other-stuff-picture15

 

Okay - flame suit on.


Kyle Rodgers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going on, that was my choice... landed on time in EHAM, pax happy. Thanx. 


Andreas Berg
pmdg_j41_banner.jpgpmdg_trijet.jpg

PMDG 737NGX -- PMDG J41 -- PMDG 77L/77F/77W -- PMDG B744 -- i7 8700K PC1151 12MB 3.7GHz -- Corsair Cooling H100X -- DDR4 16GB TridentZ -- MSI Z370 Tomahawk -- MSI RTX2080 DUKE 8G OC -- SSD 500GB M.2 -- Thermaltake 550W --
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically - EROPS has been degraded; Check the flightplan for the EROPS segment - usually over water - to make sure it is inside the new EROPS limitations for 2 gens. (you'v turned into a twin as far as electricity is concerned).

 

Aux Pitot heat is down - Primary is still working. Checking enroute weather is an idea to make sue you don't encounter icing.

 

Talk to company maintenence (satphone, HF, VHF relaying via other company traffic, ACARS, whatever you need to do).

 

Trouble shoot to the extent you can (which is probably already covered in the above 2 items)

 

Make a Decision (divert? Change the flightplan to go around icing or stay closer to diversion airports? keep trucking on as planned because weather is good and no icing around?)

 

Keep re-assessing the situation periodically in case something changes (further degradation of systems or weather)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

EROPS has been degraded

 

Never heard of EROPS (Extended range ops). We learn every day... Thanx, Trent. 


Andreas Berg
pmdg_j41_banner.jpgpmdg_trijet.jpg

PMDG 737NGX -- PMDG J41 -- PMDG 77L/77F/77W -- PMDG B744 -- i7 8700K PC1151 12MB 3.7GHz -- Corsair Cooling H100X -- DDR4 16GB TridentZ -- MSI Z370 Tomahawk -- MSI RTX2080 DUKE 8G OC -- SSD 500GB M.2 -- Thermaltake 550W --
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a little bit like ETOPS without the "T" bit :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the QRH directive to divert comes from an assumption that whatever caused the first failure could soon cause another?

 

I like the recommendation to call home base and talk to Maintenance.  They would know more about what could have caused those warnings.


Clark Janes

pmdg_trijet.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would divert. Since the QRH recommends it someone with way more knowledge than us has decided that divert is the best option. As a pilot you have all legal requirement to divert. Let us say that someone dies because of this (fire or some other reason) the pilot is fully responsible for that. If you land you'll be safe and know that it all went good. If it was stupid to land the company sure will change the QRH quick enough to make sure nobody else does it but the pilot's job is to follow procedures...

Yes, there are rare cases when the pilot shouldn't follow procedure but that is usually against the safer direction, not towards the unsafer..

 

HTH,

 Manfred


Manfred G.

 

Ships are cooler that you think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As a pilot you have all legal requirement to divert.

 

...stemming from where, exactly?


Kyle Rodgers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...stemming from where, exactly?

From the checklist. As a pilot you have to ensure the safety of your vehicle. If it says in the checklist that you should divert than you are forced to follow the checklist. If you land nobody can say "Why did you land? You broke a rule!" It is your job to follow the checklist. If you land and it actually was nothing wrong the company might get mad but that is their fault for having the wrong checklist, they can not sue the pilot for burning unnecessary fuel since it said to land in their papers. You can get in deep sh*t if you continue to fly and bad stuff happens though.

I admit that i am not a pilot but I am learning to be a maritime officer (ship captain) and the laws sometimes are surprisingly similar.

 

In this case the checklist is from McDonnell Douglas so I guess they chose the safer option. A company might have changed the info to something else.


Manfred G.

 

Ships are cooler that you think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...