ButtKicker Control

[Opus Software 84]

Question ... Do you have Butkicker?

 

We are contemplating adding a Butkicker interface (sound control) output for Butkicker devices and allowing the LWE to control the level of Butkicker turbulence, all coordinated with the existing DHM and Bump Aircraft turbulence.

 

Do you have Butkicker, or would you be interested in such a feature?

 

Stephen

[LeeL 272]

Just about to order it and this feature sounds promising.

 

Lee

[Opus Software 84]

Good, that will make at least two beta testers for the development cycle.

 

You and Lucasting who was asking about Butkicker in another topic.

 

Cheers

Stephen

[Richard Sennett 2,499]

Buttkicker here sounds interesting

[FastCheetah702 6]

Cool!

 

Key issue with buttkicker(FSX experiential wise) : Existing turbulence sound not distinctive enough. If Opus can have a module that allow ssome kind of software based amplification and control to the turbulence sound that sync with the aircraft shaking motion, that will be a big thumbs up! My wish...

 

Buttkicker adds the 4th dimension of immersion, with Opus weather turbulence sound sync, it will be a complete realism.

[Opus Software 84]

We have just been discussing this and the possible use of a dedicated audio output, separate from the normal FSX sounds, that we could output wave forms similar to the accelerometer data producing the DHM and Bump Aircraft motions. This is early days, we only started considering this after your post Lucasting, so I have got to do some research and start thinking about constructing bass sound waves from accelerometer data for instance.

 

I do agree with the above, it sounds very interesting.

 

Stephen

[FastCheetah702 6]

We have just been discussing this and the possible use of a dedicated audio output, separate from the normal FSX sounds, that we could output wave forms similar to the accelerometer data producing the DHM and Bump Aircraft motions. This is early days, we only started considering this after your post Lucasting, so I have got to do some research and start thinking about constructing bass sound waves from accelerometer data for instance.

 

I do agree with the above, it sounds very interesting.

 

Stephe

 

We have just been discussing this and the possible use of a dedicated audio output, separate from the normal FSX sounds, that we could output wave forms similar to the accelerometer data producing the DHM and Bump Aircraft motions. This is early days, we only started considering this after your post Lucasting, so I have got to do some research and start thinking about constructing bass sound waves from accelerometer data for instance.

 

I do agree with the above, it sounds very interesting.

 

Stephen

Thanks Stephen,  that will make Buttkicker users very happy!

[LeeL 272]

Good, that will make at least two beta testers for the development cycle.

 

You and Lucasting who was asking about Butkicker in another topic.

 

Cheers

Stephen

Lol ok sure I can do that if you want. I'll let you know when I get it

[BonanzaPilot 0]

I have buttkicker and love it. Would love to see a turbulence feature! 

[AndyPaul 11]

That would be a sweet feature!!

[DeCampos 41]

Count me in!

[rdtv91 73]

Count another beta tester in if you want, sounds an incredibly good idea to expand the experience been using but kicker since January and now can't fly without it

 

R

 

Ryan Taylor

[Opus Software 84]

OK, I'm convinced, I will start preparing things for the development cycle and keep you informed here.

 

Stephen :biggrin:

[SierraHotel 987]

I don't have one, but will get one if this works out.

[rdtv91 73]

Perfect Stephen! Looking forward to it.

 

Ryan Taylor