A350 from FlightFactor

[Tomcat_F-14D 2]

New advanced type model by FlightFactor:

http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=79242

 

[ohsirus 241]

Wow.

[Slayer 190]

XPX is getting good quality payware aircraft now but they really need more airport developers that can make quality like Flightbeam and FSDT to get on board. 

 

This is a definite buy at any rate.

[Pugilist2 878]

Agreed about needing high quality airport developers like Flightbeam and FSDT.  The advanced model of the A350 will not be as complex as the professional models such as the 777, but still good for X Plane.

[mtaxp 666]

Agreed about needing high quality airport developers like Flightbeam and FSDT.  The advanced model of the A350 will not be as complex as the professional models such as the 777, but still good for X Plane.

They actually say that the A350 has many things that the pro's don't have for now , and that advanced products will get updates to match the pro's .

Advanced has all the systems included , so if you are doing everything right it will fly like a pro one , but the diffrence is if you are not doing everything right it will "forgive" you , while with the pro it'll less "help" you ...

[SpoonerFLIGHT 10]

Less than 5 people replied on the first ever A350 Simulation......lol WOW!

[MSFS Ralf 149]

Without the QPAC fly by wire plug in I doubt it will fly like a bus.

[Longranger 148]

Without the QPAC fly by wire plug in I doubt it will fly like a bus.

How would you know if the current QPAC plugins would really fit. Peters A380 and A 320 don't use the same plug-in.

And if necessary Flight Factor could probably license an A350 plug-in from QPAC too.

FlightFactor has no problems to simply get the helpof other specialists. So they got the help of FlyJSim for the flight behaviour of their Boeing 757.

[ohsirus 241]

That's one of the good things about X-plane developers they seem to have a more family feel when it comes to issues. 

[SpoonerFLIGHT 10]

Without the QPAC fly by wire plug in I doubt it will fly like a bus.

I agree, the Qpac is Amazing. if FF creates their own default FlightModel it won't be as good.

[Tomcat_F-14D 2]

Less than 5 people replied on the first ever A350 Simulation......lol WOW!

 

Maybe it isn't such a great news, who knows?

[Pugilist2 878]

mtaxp- What things do the advanced models have that the pro's do not? 

 

It was my understanding that the advanced models will not have a FMC that is as realistic as the pro models?

[mtaxp 666]

mtaxp- What things do the advanced models have that the pro's do not?

 

It was my understanding that the advanced models will not have a FMC that is as realistic as the pro models?

Im not the developer , but I guess some new graphic techniqes etc...

[MaDDogz 242]

not registered at the forum and dont use facebook, so looks like i cant see any progress or find out any info....way to go...

 

( is it not a no brainer to have pics of your latest newest project in an open forum so EVERY potential cutomer can see whats goin on...?)

[MarioDonick 752]

 

 

is it not a no brainer to have pics of your latest newest project in an open forum so EVERY potential cutomer can see whats goin on...?

 

x-plane.org is an open forum, and still the most important X-Plane forum. You can read there without registration. As the A350 is a X-Plane project, aimed at X-Plane users, it makes no sense to have such threads in forums where just a tiny fraction of X-Plane users are around. The "airplane development notices" section at x-plane.org is traditionally _the_ place for news about aircraft in development (at least for those developers who sell at x-plane.org).