FSX-MS A Very Nice Add-on Is Coming Our Way

[Ron Attwood 3,499]

Downloaded, installed and I pronounce them Good!

[fppilot 4,391]

So I assume this has no value for those of us using 39 USA states of Megascenery, and a number of photo-real cities......

[Ron Attwood 3,499]

Does your FSX not use any default trees? If so, then you assume wrongly.

[fakeflyer737 1,012]

VAS, FPS...much of a difference, I fly tubes but if the FPS increase is good and lower VAS I'll be happy to buy them.

[Manny 1,293]

Could someone validate this? IF this is true..then its a no brainier. 

 

"Optimized models actually IMPROVE your sim's performance - Up to 20% higher FPS"

[DeCampos 40]

anyone try it on FSX-SE?

[zmak 331]

some orbx pics

 

http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/95973-hd-trees-05s-vernonia-p3dv25/

[captain420 3,099]

Anyone bought and used this in P3D v2.5? How's the fps? Has it improve once installed? I would like to know before I buy this.

[slip-stream 5]

Clearly you have no idea what this does.

Clearly I do, and as I have stated, I do not use autogen, never have, it sucks. If I fly 'low and slow' its over payware photo scenery which does not use autogen nor placement trees. There may be those that fly over default scenery 'low and slow', and in that case it would benefit them, but probably not many I would suggest, these days. I do not use FTX scenery as I like to fly VFR and know exactly where I am.

Now, if it was accurate placement of trees in a specific area, then I'd be very interested.

 

Most, like me, have payware Airports, too which have their own set of placement trees which I am very happy with. 

[Jim Robinson 122]

 

 

I do not use autogen, never have, it sucks

 

I do not use flat photoreal, never have, it sucks.

[slip-stream 5]

Good for you, Jim.

[Demious 23]

Could someone validate this? IF this is true..then its a no brainier. 

 

"Optimized models actually IMPROVE your sim's performance - Up to 20% higher FPS"

 

No increased FPS for me...

[zmak 331]

So far looks like a luke warm reception at AVSIM

 

Rave reviews at ORBX

 

Does anyone think its not worth the $22?

[Wink207 78]

Anyone know how this product compares with Zinitech Trees HD? I have that and it looks pretty good.

[GHarrall 494]

Clearly I do, and as I have stated, I do not use autogen, never have, it sucks. If I fly 'low and slow' its over payware photo scenery which does not use autogen nor placement trees. There may be those that fly over default scenery 'low and slow', and in that case it would benefit them, but probably not many I would suggest, these days. I do not use FTX scenery as I like to fly VFR and know exactly where I am.

Now, if it was accurate placement of trees in a specific area, then I'd be very interested.

 

Most, like me, have payware Airports, too which have their own set of placement trees which I am very happy with.

Who said anything about default?

 

If you use any land class based scenery at all then this will be worth it. Since 1000s of simmers use FTX global, regions, GEX etc then it's not default is it?

 

also, as far as I know, most addon airports still call the autogen tree textures even if they are placed.

 

Obviously this product is not aimed at those using photo tiles as you don't get trees at all!

 

I wonder why even bother commenting in fact?

 

Photoscenery has its place, but not in my sim world nor in this discussion.

VFR low and slow is easily doable in FTX regions by the way, so that sweeping comment is also void.